Help a charity by pre-ordering a copy of the paperback edition of The Invisible Gorilla
To celebrate the upcoming release of the paperback edition of The Invisible Gorilla (on June 7), Chris and I are starting a charity campaign; we’re going to be supporting some charities whose missions relate to some of the topics we discuss in the book. We decided we would rather have our money go toward good causes than toward a PR firm or more traditional marketing campaign. Of course, we’re also hoping that people will pre-order our book. So, we hatched a plan that we hope will accomplish both goals and will be a win-win both for our book and for some great charities. (Of course we also hope it will be a win for our readers!)
For every copy of the paperback edition that people pre-order or purchase by June 11, we will donate $5 to a charity they select. Over the course of the campaign, we plan to donate up to $25,000 in total. At the end of the campaign, we will donate a bonus $2000 to the charity selected by the most people.
We have selected a number of charities that emphasize science, education, safety or other themes that are relevant to the topics in our book. You can see a list of the charities and what they do here. We may add a few more to the list over the coming weeks.
Want To Participate?
It’s easy! Just go to our charity promotion page for step-by-step instructions. All you have to do is pre-order the book (we provide links to make it easy), provide some basic information about your purchase, and select the charity you would like us to support. That’s it! We take it from there. The book is currently selling for about $10 online at the major booksellers, so it’s a great way to get an inexpensive copy of the book and to help support a charity at the same time. (And, if you would like to, you can also enter a drawing to win a gorilla suit.)
Please help us support these worthwhile causes! You can help even more by spreading the word about this charity campaign. Please feel free to forward or cross-post this message.
Yesterday I posted about our gorilla suit promotion for the forthcoming paperback edition of The Invisible Gorilla. If you pre-order the book, you have a chance to win your very own gorilla suit. Go here for details. In that post, I gave a few suggestions for things you could do with a gorilla suit. Here are a few more:
Wouldn’t you like to have your own gorilla suit? In the first of several promotions for the forthcoming paperback edition of The Invisible Gorilla, we have teamed up with HalloweenCostumes.com to raffle off a deluxe gorilla costume!
This week you might have seen some coverage resulting from a press release out of the University of Utah about a new inattentional blindness study by Seegmiller, Watson, & Strayer. Here are some examples of headlines resulting from the press release:
(I’m not quite sure I understand the last one. Do Brits really have a new dance move that involves chest thumping? If so, please do tell.)
The implication of these headlines are: (1) that some people typically experience inattentional blindness and others don’t, and (2) that the new study entirely explains such individual differences. Both implications are false. The first is entirely unsubstantiated and the second is a massive overextension of what actually is an interesting result. The actual study, the press release, and the subsequent media coverage make a nice case study to explore how media coverage of science can create a false understanding among non-scientists about the nature of scientific inquiry.
An earlier version of this post appeared on my Psychology Today blog on April 30, 2010.
When we look at the world around us, we feel that we are seeing it as it is. Most of the time, we are — but not because our visual system perceives the world precisely as it is. Rather, our visual system makes informed guesses about the contents of the world based on the compressed signal projected onto our eyes. And, for most practical purposes, those guesses are pretty good. Moreover, this “guessing” system work so seamlessly that we rarely notice any discrepancy between our guesses and reality. Only when we “break” the system can we reveal these default assumptions.
My 7-minute long talk at TEDxUIUC in February 2011 explains why we have to break the visual system to understand how it works. As an added bonus, I showed some terrific illusions and demos from Julian Beever, Bart Anderson, and Bill Geisler. Check it out:
Just as we can’t intuit the mechanisms of vision, we lack insight into the mechanisms of memory, reasoning, and thinking. Only when forced to confront what we’re missing do we realize that we’ve unwittingly made assumptions. We often have no idea how limited our abilities can be. The following change blindness video illustrates one such limitation:
When Dan Levin and I conducted that person-change study, we found that about 50% of people didn’t notice they were talking to a different person. That sort of person-change rarely (if ever) happens in the world. You might assume, without doing the study, that people actually keep track of all of the details of the people they interact with. Only by making a change can you reveal the extent of their change blindness. In fact, people who missed the change would never have known anything was amiss had we not asked them. This effect reveals what Chris Chabris and I call the “Illusion of Memory” — we think we remember far more than we actually do.
This sort of cognitive, everyday illusion is akin to a visual illusion. When you view a visual illusion, you are seeing the world as it isn’t — the illusion capitalizes on one of the shortcuts your brain takes when processing visual information, with the result that you see the world the way you assume it to be rather than the way it actually is. With cognitive illusions like change blindness, we think we see and remember far more than we actually do because we are unaware of the shortcuts our brain takes when representing the world. For the most part, we simply assume the world to be unchanging, and typically we’re right. We just don’t realize we’re making that assumption.
Source cited: Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 644-649 : 10.3758/BF03208840
We’re really excited that The Invisible Gorilla will be published in the Netherlands this April. Even cooler, I will be in the Netherlands to speak at PINC in May and will get to see the book in stores there!
Our publisher sent this wonderful image of a not-so-invisible gorilla at a book fair helping to promote the Dutch edition of the book to booksellers and the media by walking around the fair with a copy of the book an handing out postcards. Apparently, all the postcards were snapped up in minutes.
I’ve had a little hiatus from posting for the past month as I worked to start up the ionpsych blog for my graduate seminar on speaking and writing for a general audience (check out the site, by the way — some terrific posts about psychology and the mind/brain). I hope to post a bit more frequently over the coming weeks. Lots of really interesting science to write about.
In the meantime, here is an interesting anecdote sent in from a reader about a personal “invisible gorilla.” (for other examples, see my earlier posts here, and here and here. Check the comments for other examples from readers). It illustrates how we see what we expect to see.
I was out shopping with my 3 children all under the age of 6. After gathering all items on the shopping list we headed to the checkout. As a parent you continually check the children and all were in tow. I placed 2 items from the trolley onto the counter. I then turned around and the youngest had gone. In today’s society this is a slightly anxious moment for any parent. In a slight panic I ran to the first aisle, but he was not there. As I was heading down to the second aisle a lady came round the corner carrying a child, the child was not screaming or struggling, so I went to continue moving down the next aisle. I had to physically stop myself and double check if this was my child….unreal………..as I was looking at the child my mind was still focused on finding my child running.
Scary part of this invisible gorilla, I was looking for my child who was running away, not being carried by another person in a calm manner. If there had been additional variables it is very understandable how someone could miss something in front of them, even when looking directly at what they are looking for.
Has anything like that happened to you? Have you ever looked right at something and not seen it for what it is? If so, I’d love to hear about it (in the comments or by email).
The German translation of The Invisible Gorilla will appear this spring, and the publisher has added a cartoon gorilla to each page of the book. If you flip through the pages, the gorilla walks across the book, thumps its chest, and walks back (animation designed by Oliver Weiss). Pretty clever. We haven’t yet seen the effect in person, but we think this video from the publisher shows what it looks like:
We’re slowingslowly adding cover art for all of the forthcoming translations of the Invisible Gorilla to our international editions page. You can also see a gallery of the cover art on our facebook page. The book is now out in Russian and Chinese (simplified) and will be appearing this month in Japanese and Korean.
Update: The Japanese edition was published on February 3, and cover art was added to our international editions page.